|
"'Ring'
Around the Podium?"
by Scott Mantz

2001
|
February 12,
2002, was a day fit for a king. Well...OK, maybe not a king, but
definitely a Lord--as in "The Lord of the Rings." When
the nominees were announced for the 74th Annual Academy Awards,
director Peter Jackson's epic fantasy led the way with an incredible
13 nominations, followed by "A Beautiful Mind" and "Moulin
Rouge" with 8 nominations each.
For the most
part, the announcement was about as predictable, uneventful, and
anticlimactic as your average Hollywood blockbuster, but there were
a few surprises to be found. Topping that list was Ethan Hawke,
who finally broke out from the angst-ridden, Gen-X fare he's best
known for and held his own against a formidable opponent like his
fellow "Training Day" nominee Denzel Washington.
Renee Zellweger's
nomination for Best Actress for "Bridget Jones's Diary"
was a victory for the petite young singleton on a number of levels.
For one thing, Academy voters generally tend to overlook comedic
performances, but more importantly, Zellweger had to overcome an
enormous amount of public scrutiny when she was first cast as the
pleasantly plump British heroine. Even if she doesn't win, her nomination
alone should give her a feeling of tremendous vindication.
Sparking more
heated debate than those who were nominated were those who were
snubbed--specifically, Baz Luhrmann, whose 5-year labor of love
"Moulin Rouge" racked up 8 nominations (including Best
Picture), but not one for himself as Best Director. Though he still
has a chance to go for the gold as one of the film's producers,
his oversight in the director's category must have been a crushing
blow.
Joining Luhrmann
was his "Moulin Rouge" star Ewan McGregor, who was strangely
overlooked in the Best Actor category. Even more notable was the
omission of Billy Bob Thornton, who gave not one, but two spectacular
performances last year (in "The Man Who Wasn't There"
and "Monster's Ball"). With Academy voters likely torn
between the two films, they probably canceled each other out.
The next few
weeks will be ripe for movie buffs, film enthusiasts, and industry
experts to predict who will--or who should--clear a space on their
mantle for the little golden guy. So, without further ado, here
are my picks for who will--or who should--win come Oscar Day on
March 24.
Best Supporting
Actress:
Kate Winslet
may have gotten to a point where she can read from a phone book
and still get nominated for it, but despite her feisty turn in "Iris,"
she's got some stiff competition this year. The same goes for Helen
Mirren and Maggie Smith, who may have stood out from the crowded
"Gosford Park," but not far enough to match the sheer
power of the other nominees. That leaves Marisa Tomei, whose spectacular
performance in "In the Bedroom" finally put to rest all
the talk of her being a "fluke" for her Oscar-winning
turn in 1992's "My Cousin Vinny." However, it still goes
without saying that this race belongs to Jennifer Connelly. Her
efforts to prove herself as a dramatic actress finally paid off
with a star-solidifying turn in "A Beautiful Mind," and
given how much screen time she had, it was actually much more than
a supporting role.
And the Oscar
goes to:
Jennifer Connelly, because her beautiful turn as a supportive wife
is what made co-star Russell Crowe's ordeal more personal and engaging.
Best Supporting
Actor:
As I mentioned,
Ethan Hawke will likely have to contend with his "it's an
honor just to be nominated" speech. Ian McKellen's commanding,
authoritative, and magical turn in "The Lord of the Rings"
was about the only
performance that stood out from that sprawling juggernaut, and while
Jon
Voight may have been a dead ringer as legendary sportscaster Howard
Cosell in
"Ali," his makeup-heavy performance bordered on imitation.
Ben Kingsley got
about as far away from his saint-like (and Oscar-winning) turn in
"Gandhi" as
he possibly could, but his foul-mouthed, manic turn as an evil crime
boss in
"Sexy Beast" may turn off conservative Academy voters.
That leaves Jim
Broadbent, whose tender, dedicated, and sensitive turn as Judi Dench's
supportive husband in "Iris" stands out in a year where
he also gave two
other great performances (in "Bridget Jones's Diary" and
"Moulin Rouge").
And the Oscar
goes to:
Jim Broadbent, for the same reason that Jennifer Connelly will win
for "A Beautiful Mind."
Best Actress:
Despite their
spectacular turns, Renee Zellweger and Judi Dench simply can't hold
a candle to the other performances in this category. That especially
holds true for Nicole Kidman, but even after rising to the occasion
for her physically demanding role in "Moulin Rouge," her
passionate performance may have been drowned out by the movie's
overbearing, distracting, and hyper-kinetic style. That leaves Sissy
Spacek, a previous Oscar-winner who gave a powerfully understated
performance in "In the Bedroom," and Halle Berry, who
was an outright revelation as a down-and-out widow in "Monster's
Ball." (Ironically, both actresses played mothers grieving
over the death of a son.)
And the Oscar
goes to:
After portraying the first African-American to be nominated
for Best Actress (in HBOs "Introducing Dorothy Dandridge,"
for which she won an Emmy), Halle Berry could become the first African-American
to actually win for Best Actress! Hows that for irony?
Best Actor:
Academy voters
have a soft spot for characters with physical or emotional disabilities,
but that won't help Sean Penn, whose movie "I Am Sam"
was a shamelessly manipulative dud. There's no doubt that Will Smith
was a knockout as The Greatest, but many felt that the rest of the
movie pulled its punches. Still smarting from his own Oscar defeat
for playing a boxer in 1999's "The Hurricane," Denzel
Washington could win for his role as a corrupt cop in "Training
Day." While Tom Wilkinson gives what is truly the year's best
performance as a grieving father in "In the Bedroom,"
he doesn't stand a chance against so many acting heavyweights. Ultimately,
there's no denying that Russell Crowe was simply riveting as a Nobel
Prize-winning mathematician battling schizophrenia in "A Beautiful
Mind," and if he wins, he'll join Spencer Tracy and Tom Hanks
as having back-to-back Best Actor Oscar victories.
And the Oscar
goes to:
The numbers add up for Russell Crowe's "beautiful" performance.
Best Director:
It's one thing
for a director to win and not have his film win for Best Picture
(witness Steven Soderbergh for "Traffic"), but it's another
thing for the film to not even be nominated. That puts a damper
on Ridley Scott's and David Lynch's chances. As for Scott, his gritty,
realistic approach to combat was already covered by--and awarded
to--Steven Spielberg for 1998's "Saving Private Ryan,"
and as for Lynch, his bizarre, twisted style may be a little too
far out for the Academy. Scoring his 5th nomination and entering
his 5th decade as a filmmaker, a victory for Robert Altman would
further double as a tribute to his brilliant career. Then again,
the Academy could also go for Ron Howard's "A Beautiful Mind."
Not only is Howard extremely well-liked among his peers, but many
felt that he was snubbed of a nomination for 1995's "Apollo
13." Then again, there's Peter Jackson, who adapted a seemingly
unfilmable book into an utterly convincing fantasy world that many
said couldn't be done (and in that sense, "The Lord of the
Rings" is a virtual lock in the technical categories).
And the Oscar
goes to:
Happy days are here again for Ron Howard.
Best Picture:
Typically, the
film with the most nominations goes on to win Best Picture (it happened
in 18 of the last 20 years). That gives "The Lord of the Rings"
a tremendous advantage, but many felt that the film's stunning visual
style was emotionally lacking. On the other hand, emotions were
the very foundation of the devastating "In the Bedroom,"
but since helmer Todd Field wasn't even nominated for Best Director,
it's chances are slim. The same goes for "Moulin Rouge,"
a film that's further hampered by having as many detractors as there
were supporters. Every twist and turn of the sprawling "Gosford
Park" came together in the end, but its stuffy British demeanor
may limit its appeal to Academy voters. That leaves "A Beautiful
Mind," whose uplifting, triumph-over-tragedy storyline overcame
factual controversies to leave Academy voters feeling all warm and
fuzzy inside.
And the Oscar
goes to:
It's a "beautiful" night for "A Beautiful Mind."
Well, there
you have it! In closing, let me reiterate that my choices are not
based on any scientific analysis. It's just my opinion, and in most
cases, picking the winner came down to a process of elimination.
Otherwise, it would have been about as frustrating as trying to
predict the winning numbers of the state lottery!
In the end--even
with all the awards shows that take place between January and March--it
all comes down to one word: Oscar. And come March 24, we'll find
out once and for all if Oscar has a "mind" of his own,
or if the Academy Awards gala will be a three "ring" circus.
|