|
"It's
OK to Breathe Again!" by Scott Mantz
There's an old
saying that goes something like this--in life, having is not as
pleasing a thing as wanting. The notion is that as we set goals,
it's the journey that makes life worth living, not the achievement
of the end result. Well, no where better has this been exemplified
than with the events surrounding the 72nd Annual Academy Awards.
After months of speculation and debate about the nominees and potential
winners, not to mention all of the logistical snafus leading up
to the big night, this was clearly one for the books.
While predictions
about who would win the 13 1/2 inch tall, 8 1/2 pound gold statuette
changed on an almost daily basis, there was one thing that almost
everybody could agree on--that 1999 was a truly memorable year in
movies. The fact that so many movies and performances were shut
out of the race (sorry, Jim Carrey) was a clear indication of that
fact. When the nominees were finally announced on February 15, it
was clear that none of the major categories contained a shoo-in
to win the big prize.
After all the
paranoia and hysteria surrounding the dreaded Y2K bug, the new year
came and went without a hitch--that is, until the preparations for
the Academy Awards got under way. For a while, it looked like the
biggest night in Hollywood was headed for one big disaster. For
starters, the always-reliable US Post Office lost almost 4000 voting
ballots. Even if they were found, there would have been no time
for voting members to fill them out and send them back in time for
the March 21 deadline. The Academy scrambled together another 4000
ballots and extended the due date to March 23 to accommodate for
the delay.
Problem solved,
right? Wrong. By the time the missing ballots finally turned up,
55 of the gold-plated Oscar statuettes were stolen from the loading
docks of Roadway Packing. Apparently, a couple of entrepreneurs
got the bright idea to steal them and sell them at a later time
for profit. Once again, the Academy rose to the occasion and ordered
replacements, saving the day. Had it not been for Willie Fulgear,
who was scouring trash bins behind a supermarket to look for boxes
for a future move, who knows how long it would have been before
the missing Oscars were finally found?
With two potentially
huge problems solved, it was sure to be smooth sailing up to the
big event, right? Wrong again! Those roving reporters over at the
Wall Street Journal decided to run a huge piece predicting the winners
only a few days before the event. While that's nothing different
from just about every other publication in print journalism, what
made this such a dicey situation was that they were calling Academy
members directly and asking them who they were voting for. The Journal
argued that they were digging deep to cover a story, but that wasn't
a good enough excuse for Academy President Robert Rehme. He issued
a statement, asking the Academy to avoid contact with anybody claiming
to be from the Journal. It worked for the most part, but not before
over 300 members could spill the beans. As it turned out, the Wall
Street Journal was pretty much right on the money.
Political correctness
and logistical problems aside, the actual Academy Awards presentation
went off without a hitch. Producers Richard and Lili Fini Zanuck
promised a new and improved awards show from years past, boasting
a shorter running time and the elimination of those dreaded dance
numbers. On top of that, the re-induction of past host Billy Crystal
was sure to keep the proceeding fresh, funny, and fascinating.
In the days
before the event, there was no doubt that you could feel the electricity
in the air. News programs and print publications all had in-depth
analysis of who should win and why. Experts from inside and outside
the biz gave such detailed commentary on the nominees, you'd think
they were experienced psychologists. They may be just movies, but
this proves just how important movies are to society and how entertainment
news is news in itself.
It's now the
big day, and after baking in the sun for days in the bleachers lining
the red carpet, diehard movie buffs were rewarded with their patience
by catching a glimpse of Tom Cruise, Kevin Spacey, Clint Eastwood,
and just about everybody who is anybody in Tinseltown. As the stars
did their usual dog and pony show for the press, they made their
way past celebrity interviewers like Roger Ebert and Joan and Melissa
Rivers to take their seats in the Shrine Auditorium. ABC revamped
their pretentious and boring half-our pre-show from last year by
giving then-host Geena Davis the boot and sprinkling in a few different
interviewers to keep the excitement going. It worked, and as it
should, it went by fast.
After a kickoff
that included Crystal in a montage of other films, he made his stage
appearance with the first of many jokes about the missing Oscars
for the night. Already, it was clear that this was going to be a
different show from those in years past. Out was the big band musical
accompaniment that introduced the presenters and winners, and in
was a more rock'n'roll and hip-hop style. It may have seemed like
an episode of "Saturday Night Live", but it still worked and gave
the Awards the feel of a changing of the guard. Also, show announcer
Peter Coyote may have looked like a Time/Life operator, but it was
still a nice touch and it kept things moving.
It's been the
tradition of past shows to start with a bang by presenting the awards
for Best Supporting Actor and Actress. The next two hours are usually
filled with boring nonsense, including the technical awards, the
costume awards, the musical numbers, and the special awards. You
could actually go out and see another movie and make it back in
time without having missed anything important. That wasn't the case
this year. The first award to be handed out was to Lindy Hemming,
for her costume design for "Topsy-Turvy".
With the Best
Supporting Actress Award to Angelina Jolie for "Girl, Interrupted"
(no surprise there) out of the way, that gave way to the real nail-biter
of the night--Best Supporting Actor. While Michael Clarke Duncan
and Jude Law were excellent in "The Green Mile" and "The Talented
Mr. Ripley" respectively, they didn't really stand a chance. Haley
Joel Osment's touching and emotional performance in "The Sixth Sense"
was so strong that you really believed he could see dead people.
Also, considering his screen time, he actually should have been
nominated for Best Actor. After being overlooked for lead roles
in "Born in the Fourth of July" and "Jerry Maguire", Tom Cruise
hit paydirt with his career-defining performance as the sexist self-help
guru in "Magnolia". Then there was Michael Caine's ether-addicted
orphanage doctor in "The Cider House Rules". While his performance
was notable, many still predicted the winner as a toss-up between
Cruise and the kid. That all changed once Miramax mounted a staggering
advertising campaign. Caine won his second Oscar trophy, but it
was his humble and classy speech honoring the performances of his
colleagues in this tight category that proved to be the high point
of the night.
In a sheer sign
of the times, "The Matrix" won all four of the technical awards
for which it was nominated, beating out "Stuart Little" and even
"Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace". The sheer power of the
Warner Bros gamble was surely felt, and it paid off big-time. Every
movie from here on in knows it has to compete against these groundbreaking
achievements.
Say what you
like about Warren Beatty, because it really doesn't matter--there's
nobody quite like him. As an accomplished actor, director, producer,
and screenwriter, he's always played the independent game among
the bureaucratic studios--and he's almost always won. While his
stubborn reputation has always preceded him, it was nice to see
him so humble as he nervously accepted the coveted Irving Thalberg
Award. Of course, who better to present the award than long-time
friend Jack Nicholson. Only he could get away with mimicking his
cues and looking so cool in the process.
After going
through the motions with a relatively boring mid-period, things
picked up again in the last 45 minutes. After "American Beauty"
and "The Cider House Rules" won for Best Original and Adapted Screenplay
respectively, it was time for the Best Actress Award. There's no
doubt that Annette Bening was excellent as the insensitive, "Martha-Stewart-from-hell"
housewife from "American Beauty". A win for her immediately following
hubby Beatty's Thalberg acceptance speech, not to mention the fact
that she could give birth at any moment, would have kept Hollywood
buzzing for years. However, it was Hilary Swank's groundbreaking
performance as the sexually confused gender-bending risk taker in
"Boys Don't Cry" that provided the only sure thing in a tight race.
There has never been a more believable role in recent memory, and
the Academy's recognition of this was duly justified.
Debate doesn't
get any better than when you consider the nominees for Best Actor.
In the 11th hour, it was down to Kevin Spacey and Denzel Washington,
and predicting who would win was no small feat. As a miserable suburbanite
trying to reclaim his happiness, Spacey was the centerpiece of "American
Beauty". Still, Denzel Washington's performance as the wrongly-imprisoned
Rubin "Hurricane" Carter was incredible. The physical and emotional
transformation Washington went through was staggering, but the movie
was plagued by factual inaccuracies. An Oscar win would have made
him the second African-American to win Best Actor (the first was
Sydney Poitier for "Lillies of the Field", and that was in 1963!),
but that was not to be the case. The award went to Spacey, who graciously
acknowledged Washington in his acceptance speech.
As for the Best
Picture Award, there was no debate about what would win, but maybe
there should have been. The race came down to "American Beauty"
and "The Cider House Rules", but just ask anybody who's seen it,
and they'll tell you that "The Insider" was really the best picture
of the year. The mere mention of the plot, about a tobacco whistle-blower
and a reporter's battle to air his story, is enough to make you
reach for the No-doze, but director Michael Mann made an incredible
film with engrossing performances. Miramax was hoping for history
to repeat itself with another Best Picture win. It's possible that
the media backlash surrounding their ad campaign for last year's
"Shakespeare in Love" hurt "Cider's" chances, but "American Beauty"
was still the better of the two. When it won, it seemed appropriate
that the last film of the Millennium to win the Best Picture Award
would have a name like "American Beauty".
When the Academy
Awards show concluded, there was definitely a feeling of emptiness
in the air. In fact, even when it began, it felt like a let-down.
The best part about the whole experience was debating over who would
win and who should win. Whether it was hanging out around the water
cooler, making nervous conversation on a first date, or talking
about it with your friends and family, this was one conversation
that everybody could join in on. Once the show started, all that
was over. All we could do then was sit around and wait for the envelopes
to be ripped open. Not that that's not exciting, but we weren't
involved anymore.
As for the big
winner, let's not forget the true message of "American Beauty",
which was to "look closer". Look closer at the little things in
life. Look closer at the things that make life beautiful. Don't
let life pass you by. When you have a chance to be happy, seize
that opportunity, because it may never come again. While you're
at it, look closer at the movies of 2000--I can't wait to take this
journey again same time next year.
Check
out Scott's Best and Worst of 1999 articles as well as his predictions
on who would take the Oscars in the
December Archive !
|